09 / INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT
General report
Brings biodata, ability, personality, values and interview findings together within the job family framework. It preserves the source, meaning and interpretive limits of each finding.
- KEY QUESTION
- What do all the findings say in the context of the role and the organisation?
- CONTRIBUTION TO THE REPORT
- An integrated summary of evidence presented for human judgement
Structure of the general report
The structure below shows how findings from the modules are organised within the same report. It is not a candidate result or an example of automated scoring.
Integrated assessment report
- 01
Role framework
Job family, position, core tasks, working conditions and success criteria.
- 02
Biodata
Job-related life-history experiences, the person’s contribution and evidence of experience to be verified.
- 03
Cognitive and physical abilities
Tests administered, relevant ability areas, comparisons where suitable norms exist, and measurement limitations.
- 04
Personality and working style
Five-factor profile, pairwise patterns, and strengths and development needs relative to role conditions.
- 05
Values and organisational fit
Shared values, complementary contributions and differences in candidate–organisation expectations.
- 06
Competency evidence
Behaviours observed in the structured interview by job family and the interviewer’s comments.
- 07
Integrated interpretation
Findings that support or contradict one another; person–job and person–organisation fit assessed separately.
- 08
Next steps
Any need for further interviews or assessment, development suggestions and the rationale for human judgement.
How are findings read together?
- Supporting evidence
- If findings about the same role show a similar pattern across modules, their sources are stated together explicitly.
- Conflicting evidence
- If a test, an inventory and a behavioural example point in different directions, the conflict is not hidden; the context and the need for further verification are explained.
- Missing evidence
- A module that was not administered, or an area without enough examples, is stated explicitly. A gap is not treated as a zero score or a deficiency.
- Decision and follow-up
- Reasons related to the role’s priorities are reviewed by a human assessor; further evidence is gathered if needed.